David Eatock, now 40, has spoken publicly about being groomed by former coach George Ormond between the ages of 18 and 21. Although he was not part of the original 2002 trial that saw Ormond convicted of abusing seven boys, Eatock has since filed his own complaint, adding his voice to the growing number of survivors seeking justice.
In a landmark decision, the court has now issued a $200 million compensation ruling to support victims of Ormond’s abuse. The payout marks one of the largest ever linked to child abuse within football, raising fresh questions about accountability — particularly over which institutions or governing bodies may ultimately bear the financial burden.
The case has reignited conversation across English football. Current England manager Gareth Southgate revealed that a former teammate was among those who disclosed their own experiences of abuse. Meanwhile, the NSPCC confirmed that its dedicated hotline for football-related child abuse received more than 860 calls within its first week — a stark reminder of how widespread the problem may be.
For Eatock and others, the ruling represents more than money: it symbolizes recognition, justice, and a step toward healing. Yet the looming question remains — who will take responsibility for funding such a historic compensation order?
